If people truly understood the maths and researched what they are relentlessly fed they would fight against the MSM Pan (dem) ic ! I always tell people that wearing a mask in the open is medieval ignorance and that you have a better chance of winning the lottery than of dying from COVID but unfortunately you can’t argue with people who lack fundamental cognitive capacity – first law of reality ! Factor in cardio pulmonary disease, obesity, stroke, hypertension, smoking and the simple fact that people actually die then what are you left with questionable fear mongering. So, simplistically, of every ten people you meet one is statistically infected, and in every one hundred of these one or 2 is likely to die.Īustralia for example has an infection rate of 3,829 per million – divide that by 10^4 and the percentage is 0.4% – 4 people in 1,000 have been infected and of those 0.08% may have died from COVID – 8 in 100,00 may have died. On the COVID side how come no-one ever mentions that the number of people infected in virtually every society on Earth is less than 10%. I get that you can for mathematical purposes but that is not reality.
For any climate related scientist dealing with a dynamic system as static is dishonest or incompetent.
I do not understand why they treat the system like it is static.
T, only a small portion gets back radiation. Thus you have an entire nocturnal cooling process.” “Secondly, obviously the whole planet is not being warmed by the Sun at the same time. Where is the warmer atmosphere slowing the cooling? I’ve asked climate scientists, other than expletives, they don’t answer. “Have you see our atmosphere? Freezing is freezing. Again, rate of cooling does not increase the original T.” What does show is the tropics are warmer from solar forcing. Slowed cooling by CO2 does not exist, nowhere in the atmosphere is it shown. ” That doesn’t change the original T of the surface. Those kinetic interactions are the vibrations in molecules. Now interactions slow the cooling rate, while the sun doesn’t stop bombarding us. RATE OF COOLING dont increase T, only a small portion gets back radiation. Tom’s shorthand Twitter version of “global warming”. I mean this is demonstrating precisely what I discussed regarding Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems – the BOT can form syntactically correct and readable sentences, but they contain no semantic meaning at all.] Very relevant to this and the previous post about redefinitions.Īfter the previous quoted sentence, it follows with what can only be described as gibberish, word salad to create the pretense or façade of a commanding use of scientific language, but which has no meaning at all.
#Elite proxy switcher 1.29 build 170917 software
This is a weapon, guys…this is a SOFTWARE CYBERSPACE PSYCHOLOGICAL WEAPON, designed to destroy knowledge, reason, comprehension, understanding, definitions, etc. No, the energy is simply being diluted by the inverse square law, which was its previous sentence. “Since energy cannot be created or destroyed, space must be absorbing that energy” “the result of an increasing distance and increasing area”īut then, it follows up with an inversion deflection:
Look at how it gives the answer which is the inverse square law: sophistry and obfuscation and the creation of new illogics. Does anyone know if this is a real person? It seems like it’s actually a BOT, still probing to pass the Turing Test, or at least, a BOT designed to inflict the negative dialectic i.e. [JP Edit: Guys look at this program…I see it posts on my articles on PSI too. It is the energy emitted by an object that determines its size, not its mass. Since energy cannot be created or destroyed, space must be absorbing that energy but because there is no mass to transfer that energy to, there is nothing to re-radiate that energy making it detectable. The energy emitted by the sun is greater than its energy reaching the Earth, the result of an increasing distance and increasing area.
0 kommentar(er)
